Figma’s IPO: From Blockbuster Debut to “Reality Check”

Investing Basics, Market Analyses, Market impact, Stock Investing |

When Figma, Inc. went public in July 2025, it was one of the most talked-about debuts in years for growth stocks. The company’s journey from private markets to public trading highlights the difference between valuation expectations and what the market actually pays, and it offers a useful lesson for investors about price discovery, sentiment, and long-term fundamentals.

The IPO Basics

Figma priced its initial public offering at $33 per share when it listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “FIG.” That price reflected the valuation at which the company issued new shares and raised capital from public investors. (figma.com)

The IPO raised about $1.2 billion of new capital and implied a valuation in the range of about $19 billion for the company at the time of the offering — not the higher market prices seen during trading. (Blockchain Council)

First-Day Debut Surge: Understanding What Happened

When FIG began trading on July 31, 2025, the stock opened around $85 per share on its first day of public trading — more than 150 % above the IPO price — and went even higher intraday, with some reports showing prices near $115–$120. (Yahoo Finance)

This remarkable first-day performance pushed Figma’s market capitalization above $60 billion, making it one of the largest U.S. tech company debuts in recent years and one of the most dramatic initial pops observed in the 2025 IPO class. (Financial Times)

But that opening trading price is often misunderstood. The IPO price — the price the company and its underwriters set for the public sale — was $33. The opening trading price of $85 was simply what early public market buyers were willing to pay once shares were freely trading. It does not reflect the amount of money Figma raised or the price at which most long-term public shareholders originally purchased shares. (Blockchain Council)

Why the Disconnect Matters

The difference between the IPO price and the first trading price highlights how private valuations and early trading dynamics can diverge from the actual capital-raising price.

Private markets — where venture capital firms price rounds based on future growth potential, network effects, and strategic positioning — can value a company much higher than the price public investors initially pay. Once a stock begins trading, real-money market demand, supply of available shares, and short-term trading behavior can push prices far above or below the IPO level. The spectacular opening price isn’t what the company sold its shares at; it reflects immediate demand from traders and institutions on day one. (Blockchain Council)

 

What Happened After the Debut

In the months following the IPO, Figma’s stock declined significantly from those early heights as the initial enthusiasm faded and trading began to reflect longer-term investor assessment of fundamentals like revenue growth, profitability prospects, competition, and macroeconomic conditions. As of early 2026, FIG has traded more in the $30–$40 range, around or below the original IPO price. (Yahoo Finance)

This pattern — a strong first day followed by a retreat toward a more sustained trading range — is common in highly visible tech IPOs once the “post-IPO euphoria” settles and broader market investors decide where they think real long-term value lies.

What This Mean for Investors

There are several practical takeaways from Figma’s IPO trajectory:

1. The IPO price is the real valuation for new public money.
What matters for the company and long-term public shareholders is the price at which the IPO was issued. First-day trading prices are noisy and driven by immediate trading flows and sentiment. (figma.com)

2. First-day pops can be misleading as valuation indicators.
Day-one prices are not long-term forecasts. They reflect short-term supply/demand imbalances, often with very low float relative to total shares. Much of the early price action is driven by traders and algorithms rather than fundamental investors. (Blockchain Council)

3. Long-term public pricing depends on business fundamentals.
After the initial debut, price action tends to correlate more with operational performance (revenue growth, margins) than with excitement or hype. In Figma’s case, as the stock moved back toward the IPO range, broader investor focus shifted to earnings prospects and competitive positioning. (Yahoo Finance)

4. Comparing private valuations with public market prices needs context.
Private market valuations based on venture rounds are often higher because backers pay for future potential with less regard for near-term results. Public markets, especially for loss-making or early-profit companies, require clearer paths to sustainable earnings before assigning high valuations. The gap between first-day trading highs and later price levels highlights that shift in lens.

Investor Lessons: What to Watch With IPOs

·    Don’t anchor on opening trading prices. An IPO opening price can be several multiples of the offer price due to short-term demand, but this does not necessarily reflect long-term valuation.
·    Look at the IPO price and fundamentals. The price at which new shares are issued is the baseline for company-level valuation; fundamentals such as revenue growth and profitability trends matter more for long-term gains.
·    Understand market psychology. IPO enthusiasm can push prices into extremes; later trading tends to reflect a blend of sentiment and fundamentals.

Sources

Disclaimer: The content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, investment or financial advice.
It is important to conduct your own research or consult with a financial or investment advisor. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All logos or brands are referenced for identification purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement of any kind. This information is accurate as of the date of publication and may not reflect recent changes. Access our comprehensive legal disclaimers at https://musaffa.com/disclaimer.