Palo Alto's Q2 Beat Was Insufficient; The Focus Switched To Margin Trade-offs In The FY26 EPS Guide.
Foziljon Kamolitdinov
Foziljon Kamolitdinov
February 19, 2026

Executive Snapshot

Shariah screen: Pass—the majority of business activity is Halal (95.94%), with the interest earned on interest-bearing assets accounting for the non-Halal component (4.06%); the debt screen is still clean (0.00%) with no interest-bearing debt.

Revenue $2.59 billion, non-GAAP EPS $1.03, Next-Gen Security ARR $6.33 billion, and RPO $16.0 billion (all above consensus) were the major KPIs that Q2 recorded a clean beat on.

The market's response was centered on the guidance rather than the quarter: FY26 EPS was guided below pre-earnings estimates ($3.65–$3.70 vs $3.85–$3.87), but the FY26 sales projection was raised ($11.28B–$11.31B).

The stock's current price of $163.50, down -18.21% over the last three months and significantly below the 52-week high of $223.61, indicates that investors are reevaluating the "growth vs. profitability" combination.

Since valuation is still difficult (Forward P/E 43–46x, EV/Sales 11–12x), the standard for clear guidance is raised.

What’s moving the stock now

The market is now more interested in "what did you trade to beat?" than "did you beat?" Palo Alto is in this stage. On paper, Q2 was excellent, with revenue, EPS, Next-Gen ARR, and RPO all hitting four consecutive beats. However, because management's projection suggests that near-term profit per share is not scaling in accordance with the increased sales trajectory, the price reaction pivoted on the EPS route.

Investors are attempting to price that disparity as the story:

  • There is strong revenue momentum (Q3 and FY26 revenue guides exceeded pre-earnings projections).
  • As Palo Alto moves further into platform consolidation, AI-enabled security, and identity, EPS guidance was reset downward, indicating either mix effects, increased investment, or margin degradation.

Simultaneously, news flow emphasizes Palo Alto's intention to continue expanding its capabilities, including plans to acquire Koi to enhance its agentic skills. This aligns with the "invest now" narrative but also underscores why EPS projections may understate near-term revenue.

Expectations Gap

Q2 FY26: Surprise percentage and actual versus estimate

  • Revenue: $2.59B vs $2.58B → +0.4% surprise
  • Non-GAAP EPS: $1.03 vs $0.93–$0.94 → +10% vs midpoint
  • Next-Gen Security ARR: $6.33B vs $6.13B → +3.3% surprise
  • RPO: $16.0B vs $15.8B → +1.3% surprise

The actual "gap" between guidance and pre-earnings expectations

  • Q3 revenue: $2.94B–$2.95B vs $2.60B–$2.61B → +13% (midpoint basis)
  • Q3 EPS: $0.78–$0.80 vs $0.91–$0.92 → -14%
  • FY26 revenue: $11.28B–$11.31B vs $10.50B–$10.53B → +7%
  • FY26 EPS: $3.65–$3.70 vs $3.85–$3.87 → -5%

The setting suggests that the market is being asked to tolerate a lower EPS slope while accepting a higher-growth path. This is precisely the kind of mix that can put pressure on the stock even following a "beat quarter," particularly at premium multiples.


Operating read-through

Annual Recurring Revenue and Remaining Performance Obligations reinforce Durability

For security platforms, two KPIs are important since they indicate stickiness and forward demand:

  • Next-Gen Security ARR: $6.33B (ahead of consensus)
  • RPO: $16.0B (ahead of consensus)

This combination indicates that users are investing in the platform; however, the main question is whether this investment is being made at a higher cost to gain or retain users, which would be reflected in the EPS forecast.

The model transition is the "why" underlying the guide, and the quarter appears to be going well.

Overall, Q2 showed no signs of operational weakening. The conservative EPS guide's most plausible justification is strategic:

  • Putting money into a wide range of platforms (cloud, SOC, identity, and network security),
  • Developing automation and AI capabilities,
  • And potentially leaning into deal structures that favor ARR expansion (which can pressure near-term margin math).

Product momentum vs the risk of platform bundling

Product revenue strength was emphasized in news commentary, particularly the reported 22% YoY growth. Product strength can sustain short-term revenue, but platform and bundling changes can also change the profitability mix and revenue recognition. Guidance is therefore the lever investors focus on.

Valuation + positioning

  • Price behavior: Following a three-month drop of 18.21%, PANW is now trading at $163.50, closer to its 52-week low of $144.15 than its high of $223.61.
  • Forward P/E 43–46x, EV/Sales 11–12x, and FCF yield 3–4% are still premium multiples, indicating that the stock usually requires clear guidance and a stable EPS trend.
  • The practical conclusion is that, as the post-print scenario indicates, tiny EPS-guide adjustments can overshadow significant revenue beats when valuation is this tight.

Catalysts

  • Proof that the trend of Next-Gen Security ARR continues to compound in the direction of the FY26 projection.
  • The quickest way to calm sentiment is probably to provide any details that clarify the EPS guide (mix, investment cadence, and margin targets).
  • Updates on the development of agentic/AI capabilities, including M&A's role in the platform roadmap.
  • Will sales outperformance result in increased EPS confidence or ongoing prudence in the upcoming quarterly print?

Risks

  • Margin path risk: multiple compression becomes a serious danger if revenue guidance rises while EPS guidance falls below expectations.
  • Platformization execution risk: combining several security categories may lead to conflict (sales cycles, integration, product overlap).
  • Intense competition: the securities market remains crowded; sustained ARR outperformance often requires ongoing investment.
  • Valuation sensitivity: premium multiples require guidance to earn the multiple every quarter, leaving less space for "explaining later."

Conclusion

Based on Palo Alto's Q2 statistics, which show improvements in revenue, Next-Gen ARR, and RPO, the company's underlying demand appears to be holding up well. The arrangement, however, also suggests that the market is currently pricing a trade-off between slower EPS growth and greater growth. Given that the stock has already been under pressure for three months, the next re-rating will likely depend on management's ability to translate ARR momentum into a more distinct and assured profitability trajectory.

Source:

  • Palo Alto Networks Inc. Stock Analysis - (Musaffa)
  • Palo Alto Networks Inc - (Gurufocus)
  • Palo Alto Networks targets $11.3B revenue and 53% NGS ARR growth for FY 2026 as AI and identity security drive strategy - (SeekingAlpha)
  • Palo Alto Networks Reports Fiscal Second Quarter 2026 Financial Results - (Press Release)

Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, tax, or financial advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any security. It is not tailored to your financial situation, risk tolerance, or investment objectives. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and all investing involves risk, including loss of principal. All opinions, analyses, forecasts, and estimates reflect the author’s views as of the publication date and may change without notice. Market conditions can change rapidly.

Stock screenings, Halal status, ratings, and classifications are based on AAOIFI standards and the oversight of Musaffa’s Shariah scholars and may change over time. Musaffa Islamic Socially Responsible Investing (MISRI) rankings are proprietary, may be in beta, and are not guaranteed to be accurate or complete.

Musaffa is a registered investment advisor (RIA) but is not a broker or dealer. Registration does not imply endorsement by the SEC. Musaffa does not execute or solicit securities transactions. Analysts may be internal or third-party contributors and are not necessarily licensed or certified to provide any professional advice.

Information is provided “as is” and may be sourced from third parties. Musaffa does not guarantee accuracy, completeness, or timeliness and is not responsible for errors or third-party content. Logos and trademarks are used for identification only and do not imply endorsement.

Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified financial and/or religious advisors before making any decisions. For further details, please refer to the General Disclaimer.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we hold no positions in any securities mentioned and have no plans to initiate any within the next 72 hours. This article reflects my own opinions, for which I receive no compensation other than from Musaffa. I have no business relationship with any company mentioned.