Why Many AI Companies Are Not Profitable
Nusrat Ahmed
Nusrat Ahmed
February 09, 2026
Fintech
Analysis
Investment Strategy

For the past several years, “AI” has been the hottest word in investing.

Startups raised billions, big tech companies promised a new era of productivity, and stock prices often jumped on little more than a mention of artificial intelligence in an earnings call or press release.

But that phase is starting to fade.

Today, investors are asking a far simpler — and far more important — question: is this company actually making money, or just burning cash more efficiently than before?

For everyday investors, this moment matters more than hype cycles or flashy demos. It’s about understanding which AI companies can realistically survive as businesses, and which ones are quietly bleeding cash behind impressive headlines.


The AI Boom Was Built on Spending, Not Profits

Much of the early AI boom followed a familiar playbook: grow fast, spend aggressively, and worry about profitability later.

Companies hired expensive engineers, purchased massive amounts of computing power, ran large models around the clock, and offered free or heavily subsidized tools to attract users. This “growth at all costs” strategy isn’t unique to AI — it mirrors what we saw with ride-sharing, food delivery, and social media platforms — but its flaws have become increasingly visible, as explained in Harvard Business Review’s analysis of why the model is breaking down. (HBR, 2023)

What makes AI different is the scale and persistence of its costs.

Training and running large AI models can cost millions of dollars per month, particularly as user demand increases and models become more sophisticated. Unlike traditional software, where marginal costs often approach zero, AI systems require continuous spending on hardware, energy, and infrastructure — a reality the Wall Street Journal has highlighted in its reporting on the true cost of AI operations. (WSJ, 2024)

Why Investors Are Getting Nervous Now

Two structural shifts are driving a more cautious investor mindset.

First, money is no longer cheap.
As interest rates rose, the easy funding environment of 2020–2021 largely disappeared. Venture capital became more selective, follow-on rounds became harder to secure, and companies could no longer assume that fresh capital would always be available to cover ongoing losses — a trend documented in PitchBook’s analysis of venture funding pullbacks. (PitchBook, 2023)

Second, AI costs don’t scale cleanly.
In many AI businesses, growth doesn’t automatically improve margins. More users often mean more inference costs, more servers, and higher energy consumption, which can push expenses upward just as fast — or faster — than revenue. The Financial Times has noted that this dynamic is forcing investors to rethink how they value AI startups. (FT, 2024)

What “Bleeding Cash” Really Means

When investors talk about AI companies “bleeding cash,” they’re really talking about cash flow — not vision, not potential, and not long-term promises.

A company is typically bleeding cash when expenses consistently rise faster than revenue, when each new user costs more to serve than they generate in income, and when profitability is always described as being “just a few years away.”

History suggests that markets eventually lose patience with businesses that never cross the line into sustainable profitability, no matter how transformative the underlying technology may be. (Wall Street Journal, 2019)


The Shift Toward Real Revenue

Stronger AI companies are already adjusting to this new reality.

Instead of chasing raw user numbers, they’re charging real prices, focusing on enterprise customers who can pay consistently, and working to reduce computing costs through smaller, more specialized models. Perhaps most importantly, they’re articulating clear and measurable paths to profitability rather than relying on vague future scale arguments.

Investors, in turn, are increasingly rewarding discipline over hype — a shift reflected in CB Insights’ latest State of AI report, which shows rising scrutiny of unit economics and cash burn. (CB Insights, 2024)

What This Means for Everyday Investors

You don’t need to understand AI architecture or advanced mathematics to invest thoughtfully in this space.

Instead, focus on a few grounded questions:

  • Who is actually paying?
    Is the company generating revenue from real customers, or merely accumulating users?
  • Are costs under control?
    Does growth strengthen the business model, or does it make losses larger?
  • Are the numbers transparent?
    Be cautious of overly “adjusted” metrics that obscure ongoing cash burn. (HBR, 2023)
  • Can the company survive independently?
    Could it operate without raising new capital every year?

AI Is Real — But Not Every AI Company Will Win

Artificial intelligence is not a passing trend. It is reshaping industries, workflows, and decision-making across the global economy.

However, just as during the dot-com era, only a fraction of today’s AI companies will emerge as long-term winners. The survivors will be those that solve real problems, charge for real value, control costs, and build businesses that can sustain themselves without constant external funding.

For investors, the goal isn’t chasing AI headlines — it’s identifying companies that can reliably turn intelligence into income.

Bottom Line

The AI sector is entering a more mature phase:
less hype, more discipline, and far greater emphasis on revenue and cash flow.

For long-term investors — especially those focused on ethical, sustainable, and halal-aligned investing — this shift is a positive one. Real value, not speculation, is finally taking center stage.

Sources:

Disclaimer: Musaffa Academy articles are provided for informational purposes only, and are not research reports or legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Content may include historical or hypothetical data; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Stock screenings, halal status, grades, and classifications are based on AAOIFI methodology and the oversight of Musaffa’s Shariah scholars. The content is not tailored to your financial situation, risk tolerance, or investment objectives. Always conduct your own research or consult a qualified financial advisor before making decisions.

Musaffa Islamic Social Responsible Investing (MISRI) proprietary rankings are internally developed by Musaffa and are currently in beta. While we continuously work to improve accuracy and reliability, no guarantees are made regarding completeness or correctness.

Logos and brand names are used for identification only and do not imply endorsement. Information is accurate as of the publication date and may change. All content, materials, and methodologies are the exclusive property of Musaffa and are protected by copyright law.

For full details, please visit: https://musaffa.com/disclaimer

Related Articles
Islamic Finance and Fintech situation in the world
Marifat Fayz
June 19, 2021
The Metrics Are Revealing Arista's AI Networking Moment.
Foziljon Kamolitdinov
February 14, 2026
Shariah Ruling on NFT Ownership: Answer from Shariah Advisor
Nafisahon
March 14, 2022